So you are disagreeing with this statement and saying that, in fact, you are the person who knows how the whole thing works?
I knew tech work produced some large egos, but sheesh.
I'm saying no such person, even one who built up a team that they taught, exists for the modern computer.
But even if I didn't mean that, there still is nobody who could do it.
For instance, I manage a team that does "full stack" development, where full stack means I regularly interact with mechanical and manufacturing, operations, electrical engineers, battery and radio people, embedded developers, mobile, and most aspects of backend engineering. We had an issue where one of our chip suppliers changed their FW, didn't tell us, and we literally were taking apart units to get to the bottom of why units off the line weren't working properly. We go pretty deep. Still, at some point we throw our hands in the air and say "Hardware is hard, it's in the name."
You know how AWS virtualization works and how to diagnose a problem with the AWS networking stack? Yes, and yes assuming that everything AWS is responsible for is operating within spec. Obviously, I don't have access to their switches, and cannot see anything at layer 1 or 2.
But I am also incredulous by the parent.
I wouldn’t be able to diagnose traces on a motherboard or a defective (but partially functioning) CPU.
I wouldn’t be able to diagnose irregular voltage conditions or drop offs.
The amount of stuff that I know I couldn’t diagnose is absurdly high, but the amount I don’t even know that I can’t diagnose is higher still.
And my job, like the parents, is to drill down and spend time in specifics.