It's irrelevant how much they want us to make babies (Western Europe), as unless real estate prices plummet to levels affordable to young couples without rich parents, you won't see birthrates in the west go up without heavy immigration from developing nations.
They can't expect to have rising birthrates that would sustain the pyramid scheme of the welfare state while at the same time treating real estate as an investment vehicle that goes up faster than wages, squeezing the younger generations out.
Either the welfare state in the west will collapse or the real estate market will. You can't have both going up at the same time.
Ironically heavy immigration itself pushes up housing prices by increasing demand, and lowers wages by increasing supply:
https://www.independent.ie/business/jobs/not-enough-migrants...
And also, the individual productivity has stagnated over the last decade.
There's a limit to how many divs a front end dev can insert per hour and how many toilets a plumber can install per hour and this hasn't gone up lately.
Also, wages have not kept up with an individual's increase in productivity as all the gains have been skimmed by the top shareholders, not the workers.
So, please don't confuse the rise in stock prices of the bull run in US in the last decade with the rise in wages as a lot of workers haven't felt it.
Much of the gains have also been skimmed by land, many of whom happen to be workers.
I think that's part of the reason there hasn't been a strong push to for systemic change. You really have three main classes: capital, labour who happens to own some land (through homeownership), and labour without land. The second group is majority [0], and they've done mostly okay (at the expense of the third).
[0] - Or, if they're not the majority, they're still more active and involved in politics, which makes sense, as they've made a very large investment, and would like to see it grow (or at the very least, not lose its value).
In regards to your comment about the welfare state being a pyrid scheme, everything. It's why a shrinking population can keep a welfare state solvent.
> how many toilets a plumber can install per hour and this hasn't gone up lately.
Not true. Modern installation systems like are now universal in new buildings in Europe mean toilet install rates have indeed gone up.
> please don't confuse the rise in stock prices of the bull run in US in the last decade with the rise in wages as a lot of workers
Who's doing that?
The value a plumber creates by installing a toilet depends on the context of the installation.
Automation helps increase productivity per person and reduce the necessary working population to non working population ratio, but there is no natural law that automation can progress as quickly as it would need to in order to meet the expected quality of life in the face of declining proportions of working age populations.
So do house prices and taxes. Actually house prices have gone up way more than wages, eg https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/05/how-uk-house-p...
But now, it's just a way for humanity to rebalance itself.
30 years ago as we approached 7 billion humans on the planet, everyone was worrying about how we would feed ourselves and what would happen if the rate of growth kept going the same way. (Yes, I'm that old that I remember the news stories).
Now as we slowly decline, everyone wants us to make more babies.
These things go in cycles.
I think that as we get more advanced and men and particularly women, see participating and reaping the rewards of modern economies in pretty much every country -- more important than having children, it will drop even more.
But as covid shows, events will happen that cause people to rethink that from time to time. In a way, its "life" that re-balances itself without even our intervention.
It's a pendulum, and right now, it's swinging one way. It will swing back.