News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by hhm on Thursday September 04, 2008 @04:33PM (#295169)
I'm sorry I didn't understand what "closer to the rock face" means.

As far as I know, Dawkins' books give his version of evolution, that is somewhat non-standard and not yet proven. Gould used to write about evolution more as it was widely accepted by scientists on his time. I know they both have disagreements, but as far as I know Dawkins is faster in writing about not very accepted subjects as widely accepted science.

Re:About the origins of the equals sign by mechanical_fish on Thursday September 04, 2008 @05:09PM (#295205)
Hm, perhaps I am misusing that metaphor. Let me try a different metaphor: As you move from well-established, abstract, general principles to newly-proposed ideas that are still being tested against a bunch of specific data, you'll find scientists disagreeing with each other more and more. At the very edge of science, where new hypotheses get started, the put-downs can get pretty sharp. Just because Scientist A calls Scientist B a statistically-ignorant fool doesn't necessarily mean, in any objective sense, that Scientist B is a statistically-ignorant fool. They may just be embroiled in one of those academic debates.

As for your generalizations: I think they're way too sweeping. Gould and Dawkins have written hundreds of thousands of words. Some of those words are probably too daring, others not daring enough; some are words about cutting-edge subjects, some are about classic works in their fields. Some of their words have caught fire in the popular imagination to a much greater extend than their authors intended, i.e. Dawkins' "meme" concept was originally intended as a half-joking metaphor, and he himself doesn't take it too seriously.

Re:About the origins of the equals sign by jacobolus on Friday September 05, 2008 @05:50AM (#295724)
Indeed, “meme” is a stupid name for what was completely understandable when simply called an “idea”. The analogy of ideas to genetics is not particularly insightful, and at this point quite worn through.
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by thwarted on Sunday September 07, 2008 @12:51AM (#297272)
People congratulate themselves when they have an idea. A group doesn't get an idea. You get a meme from someone else, and it seems to survive on its own. Not all ideas are memes, and not all memes are ideas.

But finding a meme these days is like mentioning the long tail. It seems a little antiquated and cutesy.

Re:About the origins of the equals sign by hhm on Sunday September 07, 2008 @09:55AM (#297489)
Not all memes are ideas? How is that so?
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by thwarted on Sunday September 07, 2008 @04:50PM (#297715)
Getting a song stuck in your head (commonly called "earworm", but I think that's a terrible name for it. I think "memelody" makes more sense) when you hear the tune or someone says something that reminds you of it I think qualifies as a meme but not an idea, especially if there is some shared culture reference that makes multiple people think of the same tune from similar stimuli.
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by hhm on Sunday September 07, 2008 @11:27PM (#297965)
I see, thanks a lot for your reply.
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by thwarted on Monday September 08, 2008 @08:11AM (#298220)
I think certain kinds of celebrity gossip may qualify as memes also. I'm confident that gossip is definitely not "ideas".
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by hhm on Monday September 08, 2008 @10:42AM (#298358)
Thank you again, I should check strong definition of "idea" in use but anyway I see the point there.
Re:About the origins of the equals sign by hhm on Thursday September 04, 2008 @05:36PM (#295235)
Thank you for your interesting replies.