Re:A molten salt storage solution using sodium hydroxide
by ggm on Thursday December 09, 2021 @06:03PM
(#29504291)
That's good. Condensers and like appeal to my steampunk sensibility but they aren't magic or instant. If batteries can do reactive quickly and as well as they do FCAS then it's a huge plus. Getting more than 6 hours is a good point too. I'm sure battery tech is going to include scaling to meet that, this kind of heat storage might just be about time to market.
Re:A molten salt storage solution using sodium hydroxide
by namibj on Friday December 10, 2021 @01:31AM
(#29507023)
Inverters are far better than anything rotating-mass-based for control over waveform. At least if you want to, that is. You just take a (possibly GPS-disciplined) quartz oscillator and have no issues hitting 50ppm frequency stability at lower phase noise than can get through the system at 50/60Hz.
They can essentially do this instantly, i.e., substantially sub-wavelength of your line frequency (a PWM of 10 kHz isn't even high for an inverter, and 100 kHz is well within what's feasible for large systems operating at a couple hundred volts; 10 kHz would equate a light-speed delay of 30km, 100 kHz of just 3km, which gets into the territory of relativistic w.r.t. medium voltage rings in cities).
We still need storage solutions like this for long term storage, though, as batteries are mainly used for load shifting and short term arbitrage right now, at 6 hours of discharge and less.