News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by mindslight on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @11:25AM (#29474393)
I've got a few Mikrotik devices (CRS328, CSS326). Maybe I just haven't gotten it, but I find their RouterOS WebUI extremely confusing. Like go into three separate top-level tabs to assign a VLAN to a port. The CLI is okay, once you get stuff working and just need to duplicate/modify lines.

Mikrotik's SwOS is alright and has most of the options you'd expect from a switch, but is missing the ability to have a human readable text config. I've got a Netgear switch as well, and I'd label its obtuseness on par with RouterOS. At the end of the day it seems every network vendor has their own bespoke proprietary UI that you have to suffer through.

In general I'm much more at home with Linux's iproute2/bridge-utils/nft. What I really want is some low power switches that can run OpenFlow or the like so I can centralize all the config back to my Linux router. On a home network, most devices shouldn't be talking directly among themselves anyway!

Another thing I really want is for network switches to have an RGB LED on each port that can indicate what VLAN it's configured for.

Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by iso1210 on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @12:07PM (#29475140)
Yes, mikrotiks separate bridges, vlans, interfaces.

If you want to set ether 3, 4 and 5 to untagged vlan called "Alf" with ID 11, ether 6 to untablled vlan "Bob" (id 12), and ether 7 and 8 to a trunk of both Alf and Bob, you can do

1) Create a bridge for Alf, and a bridge for Bob

2) Assign IPs for them (assuming your mikrotik is the router), and maybe dhcp pools, server etc

3) add ether3, 4 and 5 as bridge ports for Alf, and ether6 for Bob

4) Create a vlan interface on ether7 for Alf with vlanid=11, add to bridge Alf

5) Create a vlan interface on ether8 for Alf with vlanid=11, add to bridge Alf

6) Create a vlan interface on ether7 for Bob with vlanid=21, add to bridge Bob

7) Create a vlan interface on ether8 for Bob with vlanid=21, add to bridge Bob

But the killer is there are two different recommended ways to do it depending on the hardware.

Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by mindslight on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @12:19PM (#29475332)
I haven't looked at my config in a while. It appears I've got a single bridge, and ports get added to it with their VLAN tags (for ingress, I believe) -

    /interface bridge port
    add bridge=_bridge interface=sfp-sfpplus1
    add bridge=_bridge frame-types=admit-only-untagged-and-priority-tagged ingress-filtering=yes interface=sfp2 pvid=10
But then I also have to define the VLAN ID for the bridge (for egress, I believe) -

    /interface bridge vlan
    add bridge=_bridge tagged=sfp-sfpplus1,_bridge, untagged=sfp2 vlan-ids=10
The device is a CRS328-4C-20S-4S+RM. It seems like I am using the other recommended way. Which would make sense because I'm not really using the "router" part of the software, but rather configuring the built in switch chip to do its thing.

Looking at the text config now it seems quite sensible, and isn't far from SwOS, Linux CLI, or switch chip datasheets. But I remember getting to that point in the WebUI being somewhat confusing, perhaps due to the alternative in-CPU way you described.

Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by locusm on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @09:07PM (#29480539)
Whats the recommended way to config VLANs if mixing recent Mikrotik router with existing Unifi switches & AP's.
Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by tguvot on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @01:57PM (#29476688)
you just need to remember that in case you make bridges:

- you need to enable hardware offloading for it

- different models have different limits on number of hardware offloaded bridges

- if it's not hardware offloaded, you run all traffic through cpu and kill throughput

Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by iso1210 on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @02:15PM (#29476926)
I tend to work with CCRs, so no hardware offloading - everything runs through the CPU (and normal throughput isn't an issue)
Re:MikroTik RouterOS v7 stable released by minimaul on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @12:03PM (#29475075)
I find that Winbox is much more usable than the WebUI - it runs well under wine (and even on m1, you can run it under wine64 under rosetta).