News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by tjoff on Sunday December 05, 2021 @04:35AM (#29447974)
I love usb-c to death but "occasional incompatibility with cheap cables" is a bit misleading.

There is frustratingly little relation between price and quality. I have literally spent hundreds of dollars on usb-c-cables and I haven't even attempted to do displayport or thunderbolt through one, and I still don't own any that I'd expect to work on a lot of scenarios.

Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by cyberge99 on Sunday December 05, 2021 @09:30AM (#29449468)
If price isn’t a primary consideration, get a Thunderbolt 4 cable and be confident it will work everywhere, particularly if it’s an active TB4 cable:

https://chrisbergeron.com/2021/07/25/Ultra-fast-Thunderbolt-...

Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by ksec on Sunday December 05, 2021 @02:36PM (#29452272)
They cost $30 and still not support 240W. It would be an easier advice to consumer if they were $19.
Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by zamadatix on Sunday December 05, 2021 @08:56PM (#29455331)
> They cost $30... It would be an easier advice to consumer if they were $19.

It'd be easier if it were $0 too but what does that have to do with anything? $30 is what it costs to make a cable that can do high speed data, high speed display, and high power. If you want a cable that does all of this it's going to cost more than a cable that doesn't. If you want a cable that's cheaper and doesn't do everything that is also an option. Apart from both options being available anyways this problem has nothing to do with USB standards.

> and still not support 240W

When the brand new standard actually hits the shelf you'll be able to get a TB4 240W cable, as of now there just aren't any 240W cables in general. Also not supported: USB 6 and 2 kW PD or anything else from the future instead of present.

.

Type C is an interface specification not a guarantee that you're $19 cable will be compatible everything man could desire to implement in your lifetime.

Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by ksec on Monday December 06, 2021 @05:03AM (#29457954)
>Type C is an interface specification not a guarantee that you're $19 cable will be compatible everything man could desire to implement in your lifetime.

Except that is exactly what a lot of people think Type C will and should provide. And whether you agree with that they think or not is an entirely different question.

My other reply https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29452173

Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by zamadatix on Monday December 06, 2021 @09:35AM (#29460172)
Whether people think it will or won't isn't the question - it's not the USB standards that make this ask is impossible.
Re:USBefuddled: Untangling the Rat’s Nest of USB-C Standards... by MR4D on Sunday December 05, 2021 @12:33PM (#29450956)
I’ll second this. I follow this advice and have never been let down.