Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by ksec on Thursday December 02, 2021 @08:53AM
(#29416076)
>The answer will be: these people aren't doers - they are talkers.
I think it is the market values more features and performance, with incremental improvement to current technology at small expense of security. Or the cost of features and performance with currently available tools and work force ( C / C++ ) is vastly cheaper than rewriting it in what ever PL that is.
The only reason why we are starting to do it now, is because the total computer market is 10x larger than we had. Tech is also used 10x more and all of a sudden the cost of security may be worth the cost to switch.
It is all a economic model. or Market Interest. Nothing to do with Armchair and Doers.
I think it is the market values more features and performance, with incremental improvement to current technology at small expense of security. Or the cost of features and performance with currently available tools and work force ( C / C++ ) is vastly cheaper than rewriting it in what ever PL that is.
The only reason why we are starting to do it now, is because the total computer market is 10x larger than we had. Tech is also used 10x more and all of a sudden the cost of security may be worth the cost to switch.
It is all a economic model. or Market Interest. Nothing to do with Armchair and Doers.