DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by nope96 on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @06:13PM (#29398638)

I could always tell when a BBS was running under DesqView, because it was often soooo slooow. The cool kids ran OS/2! And the really, really cool kids had Amigas (I was never clear if these were multitasking or not, but many Amiga BBS's had multi node so I assume so)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by beders on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @07:14PM (#29399105)

Yay, I'm finally a cool kid :)

I did indeed run a BBS on OS/2 and played X-Wing vs. Tie-Fighter while people were dialing in without a hitch.

At least that's how I want to remember it. Surprisingly I never tried DesqView but it looks great!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by allenu on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @03:06AM (#29401789)

Wow, the slowness of Desqview BBSes is something I haven't thought about for 30 years, but yes, you are right. I remember calling into a Roboboard-based BBS that switched to Desqview and seeing the characters type out so slowly on my screen. I think the SysOp quickly moved away from it.

I ended up running OS/2 Warp when it came time to run my own BBS. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by zik on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @06:30PM (#29398804)

Yes, AmigaOS was built around a multi-tasking kernel. It was a pretty advanced OS for its day.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by thuccess129 on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @05:47AM (#29402549)

There was clip shared on HN with Gary Jones in it showing a seven node cluster of Amiga2k used for rocket science at NASA. Very impressive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by anonymousiam on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @08:16PM (#29399526)

I ran both DesqView and DesqView/X and I never saw any performance degradation while running DOS apps. If you ran Windows under it, it would suffer because of the poor (at the time, non-preemptive) scheduler. Windows was/is by its own definition, an "ill behaved" application.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by vickm on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @03:09AM (#29401798)

OS/2 was such a game changer for me. I used that until Linux in college. In a weird twist of fate I worked at Microsoft and moved on to Windows 2000 in the late 90s. Never did run XP or 98!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by cameldrv on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @01:13AM (#29401208)

At least by the time of the 386/486 era, I never noticed any difference. I did notice a big difference with BBSes that were multitasking dos apps using Windows 3.1. The multitasking on Windows was very jerky.

OS/2 had great multitasking, but I remember its driver support being limited for multiport serial boards. I had an Arnet Smartport 8 and couldn't move from DesqView to OS/2 because there was no support for it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DESQview/X: Forgotten mid-1990s OS from the future by dunham on Tuesday November 30, 2021 @10:27PM (#29400328)

Preemptive multitasking, with no memory protection.

I think they leveraged this to do stuff like update the appearance of buttons on click in the higher priority event process (and then send an event), to give a more responsive feel to the UI.

I also remember Mosaic once had a use after free bug on graphics contexts and would occasionally render a web page in another window.

[ Parent | on HN ]