News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NPR: Books We Love by HNTA_1 on Monday November 29, 2021 @04:41PM (#29385645)
NPR's fascination with and fetishization of race is sad to see. The fact that they list the 1619 Project (an ahistoric and well debunked project) as a "book we love" was all I needed to see. The mask fell off and the leftist/wokeism bias is on full display.
Re:NPR: Books We Love by whodunnit on Monday November 29, 2021 @04:55PM (#29385765)
Everything has bias. What’s wrong with a leftist bias? Isn’t a complaint of bias in itself bias?
Re:NPR: Books We Love by foofoo4u on Monday November 29, 2021 @05:33PM (#29386168)
My top concern about its bias is how overtly biased a publicly funded radio station is with its embrace of wokeism — an ideology that is overwhelmingly unpopular with the public.
Re:NPR: Books We Love by HNTA_1 on Monday November 29, 2021 @05:06PM (#29385894)
Everything has bias. What's wrong with an alt-right bias? Isn't a complaint of bias in itself a bias?

A publicly funded media arm having an ideological bias is scary.

Re:NPR: Books We Love by whodunnit on Monday November 29, 2021 @08:40PM (#29387762)
Isn’t bias simply a matter of perspective? Isn’t it simply relative to one’s own bias? A consequence of how one measures it?
Re:NPR: Books We Love by HNTA_1 on Monday November 29, 2021 @11:04PM (#29388822)
>Isn’t bias simply a matter of perspective?

No, there are objective studies of bias.

>Isn’t it simply relative to one’s own bias?

No, there are left, center, and right sides of the political spectrum.

>A consequence of how one measures it?

No. You can objectively measure these things regardless of where you personally lie on the political spectrum.

There's literally a science behind this: political science [0]

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_science