News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PyTorch: Where we are headed and why it looks a lot like Julia (but not exactly). Parent comment

Re:PyTorch: Where we are headed and why it looks a lot like ... by rg111 on Friday November 26, 2021 @11:13PM (#29357335)
With the slightest hint arising that Julia would be the future of ML and DL, I learned it.

But, then what?

I could not use it anywhere I worked. The ecosystem was lacking.

Julia is good, but for what exactly?

People involved with Julia are always big with words, but when will I see it in use somewhere?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PyTorch: Where we are headed and why it looks a lot like ... by pjmlp on Saturday November 27, 2021 @05:40AM (#29359151)
You can apply to a job here,

https://juliacomputing.com/case-studies/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PyTorch: Where we are headed and why it looks a lot like ... by dunefox on Saturday November 27, 2021 @06:57AM (#29359497)
The ecosystem is a superset of Pythons: https://github.com/JuliaPy/PyCall.jl
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PyTorch: Where we are headed and why it looks a lot like ... by cookieater on Saturday November 27, 2021 @12:39PM (#29361851)
It's probably more fair to claim that R/Python/Julia have the same ecosystem now if you are willing to deal with speed bumps and some clunky interfaces. Because there are packages going in both direction for all three.
[ Parent | on HN ]