Re:Underdog no more, a deaf football team takes California b...
by mosen on Monday November 15, 2021 @02:35PM
(#29231638)
A person that can hear.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
[dead]
Re:Underdog no more, a deaf football team takes California b...
by michaelpb on Monday November 15, 2021 @03:09PM
(#29232039)
Are you asking for writing tips? I'm not OP, but for one "someone who isn't deaf" is 4 words and has a complex structure while "hearing person" is 2 words and has a simple structure, and thus is more effective writing.
It seems strange to me to suggest more complicated structures to replace simpler ones! Is there another reason to use the more complicated structure?
Re:Underdog no more, a deaf football team takes California b...
by xeromal on Monday November 15, 2021 @09:37PM
(#29236053)
Deaf person is also 2 words. lol
Re:Underdog no more, a deaf football team takes California b...
by dylan604 on Monday November 15, 2021 @11:05PM
(#29236672)
Yes, but they were not stating they were a 'deaf person' they would be saying 'not a deaf person' which is back to 4 words. "Hearing person" is still only 2 words.
The things that get nitpicked on this site confound me to the level of not being able to look away from the train wreck.
Re:Underdog no more, a deaf football team takes California b...
by apeace on Monday November 15, 2021 @04:27PM
(#29232995)
Yes, someone who isn't deaf. "Hearing" or "hearing person" is the vernacular used in the deaf community. It can be important to establish depending on the context. In this case I wanted to make it clear that I was learning ASL despite not being deaf.
Re:Underdog no more, a deaf football team takes California b...
by RavingGoat on Monday November 15, 2021 @03:09PM
(#29232043)
Can you see or are you nonblind?