News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by ak_111 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:00AM (#29188508)
Perhaps the more fundamental question here is why most employees don't try to exploit this imbalance by continuously applying to other companies?

If they did so then we will eventually reach an equilibrium where companies would spend more on retention than recruitment.

Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by oxymoran on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:04AM (#29188566)
Because people get complacent and changing jobs is a lot of work. Updating resumes, writing cover letters, prepping for interviews, kissing butts in interviews, taking drug tests, onboarding..thinking about going through that makes my skin crawl. Most people won’t go through that until they are pushed to their limit by a company. And every job I have quit was because of culture and/or incompetence, had nothing to do with money.
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by hnuser847 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:19AM (#29188747)
They do. Job hopping every 1-2 years is pretty standard for software engineers, and it's pretty common for people to feel like the only way to get a significant raise is to get a new job.

I job hopped throughout my 20s, partially to increase my income but also because I was hoping to find a company that isn't dysfunctional. So far I haven't found one. The biggest problem with retention, IMO, is that the vast majority of companies are shiny-object chasing feature factories. The framework, language, and library churn is just exhausting and saps all the fun out of writing software.

Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by jareklupinski on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:05AM (#29188575)
> why most employees don't try to exploit this imbalance by continuously applying to other companies?

we do; it's great :)

https://www.inc.com/business-insider/tech-companies-employee...

> Uber was at the bottom of the list, with a short average employee tenure of just 1.8 years.

> Netflix has broken the three year barrier, holding on to employees for an average of 3.1 years, to be exact.

Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by Guest42 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:05AM (#29188581)
Because having too many companies on a resume prevents a person from being employable
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by sokoloff on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:41AM (#29189092)
5 6-month stints in a row is a red flag for me (as a hiring manager).

If you have 3 18-24 month stints (and ideally earned a promotion at any company [rather than only on a company change]), and a couple of shorter ones, it's fine.

People are overly worried about the second case, IMO. If you're at a company that sucks, the very best thing you can do is change companies.

Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by arvinsim on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:49PM (#29196146)
I usually evaluate companies at the 1 year mark. I will switch if there is a better offer. Like 30% or more increase.
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by MrPatan on Thursday November 11, 2021 @10:39AM (#29189066)
Are you from the past?
Re:Why do companies spend so much on recruitment but not ret... by MattPalmer1086 on Thursday November 11, 2021 @03:37PM (#29192841)
We are all from the past ;)