Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem
by djanogo on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @01:58PM
(#29165870)
Can somebody enlighten me on why you would use ZFS for DB?, seems like there would be overlap/conflict of features. The only benefit that I know of would be quick restore to previous state, but how often would you need to restore?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem
by jhk727 on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @02:25PM
(#29166222)
Author here - It's explained in the post but the primary driver is cost. 80%+ reduction in storage is massive when you're storing petabytes of data on ssds.
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem
by nhoughto on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @06:08PM
(#29168812)
how important was being able to disable postgres full page writes under zfs? that was almost a throw-away line in the article but could be really important for some pg workloads i'd think? certainly got my attention
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem
by jhk727 on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @09:37PM
(#29170438)
It was a nontrivial improvement to write throughput at the time. I'd imagine it could have similar impact for other write-intensive workloads.
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem
by toast0 on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @03:44PM
(#29167207)
Data integrity is nice to have.
Re:We saved millions in SSD costs by upgrading our filesystem
by jdhawk on Tuesday November 09, 2021 @02:17PM
(#29166120)
They state it. Compression