What we haven't figured out, is how consent should work with the rest of your family, who share most of your DNA. Obviously your body is yours to give consent for, but you effectively dox your whole bloodline in doing so.

I don't think there are easy answers here, but it's a conversation we should be having.

How come this is a complete non-concern in other areas?

If you give anyone (say, PayPal) your address, you’ve given then your roommates’ address as well - since you share the same IP. Nobody cares, even though the third party can immediately begin identifying your roommates without harvesting their DNA, like they would in the case of 23andme.

Giving your address to paypal doesn’t give paypal the addresses of everyone out to 3rd cousins (i.e. related via your great grandparents).

There’s a slight difference.

Giving your address does not give the address of your roommates. They also need the list of your roommates to conclude the address of your roommates.

Given that I know the mapping of an IP address and a physical address, I am unable to match one to the other?

I suspect you’re attacking a strawman.

Having the same IP address doesn't imply people are roommates. They might be coworkers, classmates, sharing Internet service, using the same VPN, etc.

Live in same general area with ISP providing CGNAT...

It is easy to move. You can't change your DNA.

If we call that doxxing, isn't that the same as an identical twin who commits a crime being held liable for defamation of the twin who shares their face?

Edit:

Or, by the same token: a parent is liable for diluting the value of their siblings DNA because they passed that DNA on to children. I don't see this going anywhere.

Not exactly, no. These are weak analogies. The second one doesn't make any sense to me at all. Maybe I'm missing something.

It's like sharing your private key, knowing that others also use that private key.

You immediately make a large portion of your family tree discoverable.

It's the same underlying reason that we (most of us lol) treat revenge porn as a bad thing. You take someone else's blanket of privacy away without their consent.

We also routinely take photos and post them. Caption them even. It’s not just on Facebook. And you routinely consent to your image being used when you attend events. Which can identify you were at a place at a specific time.

people are very quick to try to say things are really bad and describe it as doxing, but let's be clear: you drop your DNA everywhere all the time, there's no way you can prevent that. Your DNA is not private in any sense of the word.

The trouble I see with this is that you may have exposed your relatives to T&C's they didn't agree to. Perhaps some future situation where a sibling gets to pay higher insurance rates or similar.

Or becomes unable to get insurance (if in the US).

Cool, I'm glad that brought you joy. I wish they gave both of us a check box at the bottom of my spit test to opt in and everyone's happy. But they know at least half of their population would've opted out...

23andMe provides checkboxes for everything you could want to change. Even better than checkboxes on a paper form, these are consents you can give / retract at any time:

- https://you.23andme.com/user/edit/privacy/

- https://you.23andme.com/user/edit/research/

- https://you.23andme.com/user/edit/records/

A shame your dad can’t opt out. Or your mom. Or their siblings and their children. And so forth.

You can go to the settings and opt out of their Research consent document now, which also explains how the data is used. I think they 've been pretty clear about how they plan to use the data of existing customers.

There is also the danger of people having a false sense of privacy by opting out of 1 or 2 genetic tests. This is shared information between relatives and the population at large, not exactly top secret data. The degrees of separation between you and me are 2-3 , so it s very easy to identify people indirectly , hence why it was possible to solve decades-old crimes.

I think our genetic information is less private than the contents of our brains, in general.

Meh, I sent them my spit with a fake name and a temp address at the UPS Store.

Would you like to have your DNA being used to manufacture a virus that only kills you/your family, based off DNA structure some 23andMe customer bought from them? Right now 23andMe might be the "good guys" like what Google used to be, but for how long?

There are cheaper ways to kill a whole family as any organised crime boss will be happy to tell. Also, I don't like google either, but jumping from google used to be good too to your DNA will aid bioterrorism is kind of a far jump. People wanting to manufacture a virus, and who have the means to do so, don't need 23andMe database.

But what if that person is constructing the virus to kill everyone else but spare the ones with the submitted DNA? would that be OK? How far should we take this?