Re:Women are rejecting marriage in Asia. The social implicat...
by icebraining on Saturday August 20, 2011 @08:35AM
(#2906499)
>- Values: That's why religion works, it keeps values deep inside and transmit them from a generation to another.
More people have died on armed conflicts in the name of religion than for any other reason. National Socialism, for example, is a drop in the bucket compared to it.
In the 'States, non-religious people are much less likely to be in jail.
Religion is great at transmitting values, no doubt, but it's usually the wrong ones.
Re:Women are rejecting marriage in Asia. The social implicat...
by cosgroveb on Saturday August 20, 2011 @10:12AM
(#2906663)
Let's not turn this into an atheism circle-jerk. I really don't come to Hacker News for this...
Re:Women are rejecting marriage in Asia. The social implicat...
by neutronicus on Saturday August 20, 2011 @10:47AM
(#2906745)
You have no idea what the relevant numbers are. The estimated loss of life during the Crusades ranges from 3-10 million lives. Current estimates place the Russian loss of life alone from WWII at 19.5 million.
Re:Women are rejecting marriage in Asia. The social implicat...
by icebraining on Saturday August 20, 2011 @01:51PM
(#2907204)
This[1] page puts the sum of deaths of religious wars at 800 million.
Yet, we did no wars, made no commercial/art explosion (even food we don't produce).
It's not about wars, allies or anything else. I summarize it to the following:
- Justice: Yes, justice is point number one. You must have justice.
- Values: That's why religion works, it keeps values deep inside and transmit them from a generation to another.
- Education: To avoid mess, and poverty.
Military? No, you don't really need it. You need values. Look at 2006 war between Isreal and a few folks in Huzb Allah. Isreal has the strongest military in the region, along with support from the USA and Liban (gov), yet they failed.