cosgroveb

* You're right that this is very similar to our previous offering. At its core, the encryption logic is the same.

* While both libraries offer an object which will encrypt your data, that's literally all our previous offering did. New helpers used in conjunction with data attributes eliminate the need to write custom onSubmit handlers, making your integration far simpler.

* We host the JavaScript, making linking directly to it an option.

These things make our JavaScript library substantially easier to use. That, plus the fact that we now recommend Braintree.js over Transparent Redirect motivated us to rebrand it.

There are only a couple options available in the situation you describe. First, you could vault the card before you charge it. Not great. Extra code, and you may not really want to store the card after the sale (depending upon your use-case). The other work-around, while not involving the vault may even be worse. If you don't want to vault the card, you could issue a void after confirming TR if something went awry (or say you're out of stock).

This is why we're really excited about getting Braintree.js into people's hands. It eliminates an extra round-trip for the customer to a third-party which is necessary with tokenization or TR. You can validate the form data before you decide to initiate the sale. It's really simple, too.

Braintree developer here. You're right that Braintree.js is based upon our end-to-end encryption library. While that's been out of beta for some time, it was strictly for encryption (that's literally the only thing it did).

In this iteration we've added some helper methods to the Braintree object that make it much easier, in our opinion, to encrypt your payment form. In the past, if you wanted to use our encryption library, you had to intercept the POST to your server with a custom onSubmit handler to encrypt the data. Now, it's as simple as giving the id of the form you wish to encrypt and substituting the "name" attribute on your form inputs with "data-encrypted-name".

Additionally, unlike our previous encryption library, we're now hosting the JavaScript in our datacenter using the same highly available infrastructure we built for our gateway. This makes it easier to get up and going when you're spiking out your integration.

Ultimately, we felt that these improvements justified re-branding the library, especially since we now recommend Braintree.js over Transparent Redirect. Transparent Redirect unfortunately made it kind of awkward if you wanted to do your own server-side validation on the form data or do anything with AJAX.

Just use "curl http://www.example.com/install_this.sh | sudo sh"!

A little confusing I am sure since Closure Templates is a templating system that dynamically generates HTML in Java and JavaScript... And Clojure is a language that targets the JVM.

I have no experience with Closure Tools but Clojure is awesome definitely.

It's not racism if it's true!

It's happened to me. Once. Never again.

He says that he had no idea how much harder than working on Wall Street it would be. He's got to know everything about the domain, he's got to know accounting, sales, marketing, and just about every other aspect of running a business and it is exhausting for such small potential gains.

Is he really confusing programming languages with frameworks? I can't take anything serious that he writes anyways but that's pretty ignorant.

Even if it weren't an absurd statement you could say the same thing about Java, "on top of Java we put the Struts web framework. It's not very common to code anything in Java."

That must not have included all of your nice clothes.

Besides, the server is where Linux matters, not consumer hardware.