News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by sva_ on Sunday October 31, 2021 @12:36PM (#29058195)
> What you will then get is an unsustainable set of shortcuts that threaten your energy supplies at crucial times.

I like the idea of solar energy, but I also wonder about how safe it is to use. I'm thinking of events such as the 1815 volcanic eruption of Mount Tambora[0] which reportedly caused a "year without summer[1]".

Presumably, something like this would have a major impact on solar cell energy output, and if we'd significantly depended on solar, would have catastrophic consequences for our society. Unless, of course, I overestimate the effect that volcanic ash could have on solar cells.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1815_eruption_of_Mount_Tambora

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer

Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by HPsquared on Sunday October 31, 2021 @01:47PM (#29058783)
You "just" need to maintain a redundant backup fossil-based energy supply system that is not used 99% of the time, simple!
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by hackernudes on Sunday October 31, 2021 @05:28PM (#29060625)
What about nuclear instead of fossil fuel and Bitcoin mining for the redundant time?
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by vanattab on Sunday October 31, 2021 @03:12PM (#29059466)
Simple to say. Not simple to implement in practice and in a competitive environment. It is very hard for CEO to justify massive spending on something that has oy a 1:2000 chance or something in any given year.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by sva_ on Sunday October 31, 2021 @04:02PM (#29059894)
I believe the person you replied to was being sarcastic