News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by javagram on Friday October 29, 2021 @02:20PM (#29041854)
If you seriously think the government could have made us all lose weight in the last 18 months... they’ve been running anti obesity campaigns for decades and failing while obesity grows every year.

BTW covid is plenty dangerous to non obese as well.

The vaccine shot actually works well and is incredibly easy to use compared to a grueling year long weight loss and sustaining it for a lifetime, for most people.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by javagram on Friday October 29, 2021 @07:50PM (#29044768)
Look at your cdc link and it proves my point. I never said obesity wasn’t a risk factor, just that covid is plenty dangerous to the non obese as well.

“ More than 900,000 adult COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in the United States between the beginning of the pandemic and November 18, 2020. Models estimate that 271,800 (30.2%) of these hospitalizations were attributed to obesity.6”

This is from your link - even if the government put everyone in concentration camps and forced them to lose weight, it would do nothing for the other 70%

Meanwhile vaccines are about 80-90% effective against hospitalization and death.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Saturday October 30, 2021 @04:37AM (#29047117)
> Meanwhile vaccines are about 80-90% effective against hospitalization and death

And falling. Remember how people were parading around 95%?

Just like ‘99% of people in hospital are unvaccinated’. While now in some areas it’s ‘70% vaccinated’.

Vaccines are not a magic bullet and delaying covid using measures that make people fat is not a smart move. Not to mention stealing 1.5% of peoples lifetime to delay a disease that less than 1% would die from.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by javagram on Saturday October 30, 2021 @07:39AM (#29048004)
Obesity hasn’t changed that much. Around 70% of Americans were overweight or obese before the pandemic. Diet is the most important factor in weight gain or weight loss. And except for a few dumb months at the beginning, parks and outdoor areas are open for recreation. I’ve been running 4x a week for the whole pandemic without issue where I live, nothing stopped people from exercising if they wanted to follow the health advice that they’ve been hearing for decades.

Vaccines aren’t a magic bullet. But they’re the most cost effective item we have. You cite some irrelevant statistics but appear to agree with my statement that the vaccines remain more than 80% effective against death.

The vaccine costs less than $100 and takes about an hour of time to do. There is no way to lose weight that cheaply or quickly and as a result people continue to ignore government advice and health campaigns urging them to do so.

Moreover, losing weight does not stop you from catching or spreading COVID at all, whereas the vaccines have been shown to reduce transmission.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Saturday October 30, 2021 @08:37AM (#29048298)
I did not say anything about your statement ‘that the vaccines remain more than 80% effective against death’ apart from that being down from the claim it was 95% effective. And dropping.

But from the typical ‘I endured lockdown just fine’ tripe it’s clear what you think:

I have no problems with restricting others from doing things I don’t care about and I think it’s fine to force others to adopt my position. Because I think I know better than them.

And those first few months of peoples basic human rights being taken away based on ideas that clearly were never going to work? Oh, they were just a few dumb months. Pfft who cares. We’re over that now, there’s a new battle to fight. Who thinks about these measures that were going to be the end-all solution? There’s a new measure that’s going to be the end-all solution. To force on others because clearly we know what’s best for them.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by chiefalchemist on Saturday October 30, 2021 @10:17AM (#29048962)
> Vaccines aren’t a magic bullet.

That's not what the narrative says. It's earier (and popular) to say "it's a pandemic of the unvaxinated" than to tell the truth. That is, diet, lifestyle and personal health matter. They impact day to day heatlth, and they impact your ability to recover from unplanned health challenges (e.g., car accident, Covid, etc.)

The idea that there is zero connection between diet + lifestyle and health is completely unscientific. To promote / deny that during a pandemic is insane.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by chiefalchemist on Saturday October 30, 2021 @10:11AM (#29048912)
> More than 900,000 adult COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in the United States between the beginning of the pandemic and November 18, 2020. Models estimate that 271,800 (30.2%) of these hospitalizations were attributed to obesity.6”

Hospitalization is a deceptive metric. What's more important is: long term hospitalizations, as well as higher use of treatment (e.g., ICU).

That's that data needed. This other stat - like so many Covid stats - is too high level. The Devil is in the details.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by UnFleshedOne on Monday November 01, 2021 @02:13PM (#29070606)
Remember the swiss cheese model? Or lockdowns to manage the curve? Those 30% could be reduced. Also whatever percentage had bad cases because of vitamin D deficiency. Yet no messaging on staying healthy at all...

Because since not everyone can improve their immune function, nobody should, right? Messaging otherwise would be ableist or give people an idea that they could do something aside from hunkering down, and that's more important than reducing hospitalizations and saving lives...

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by foolinaround on Friday October 29, 2021 @04:19PM (#29043108)
if they have been running pro-vaccine campaigns, thats very welcome..

It is the coercion / loss of livelihood and other threats, that are getting people up in arms (figuratively, and who knows, someday in real life)

Imagine if various establishments used a weight/health card where one is scored on some heuristic, and allowed access.

Just look at intellectuals like Noam Chomsky's prescriptions on how to treat the unvaccinated...

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by javagram on Friday October 29, 2021 @07:54PM (#29044799)
> It is the coercion / loss of livelihood and other threats, that are getting people up in arms (figuratively, and who knows, someday in real life)

People were up in arms and fearmongering over the vaccine since 2020. This isn’t about coercion - there’s a reason the same people typically don’t get vaccinated themselves. If they believed in the effectiveness of the vaccine they’d be vaxxed themselves (like Republican Governors and Fox News tv hosts).

I personally know someone who thought the vaccine had a good chance of killing me and other acquaintances who took it, all because he read some random posts on the net.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Saturday October 30, 2021 @04:38AM (#29047124)
This is a straw man.

It’s perfectly possible to be for vaccinations and against mandates.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by javagram on Saturday October 30, 2021 @07:45AM (#29048026)
I never said it wasn’t possible, in fact I gave some examples of people who are - politicians and tv hosts who have gotten vaxxed.

Most people don’t fall into that category though. The “people” who are up in arms usually cite stuff like the vaccines rewriting DNA, being unsafe, untested, Nuremberg violations, “did my own research” and a hundred other reasons they found online to claim the vaccine is unsafe or ineffective.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Saturday October 30, 2021 @08:24AM (#29048232)
> I personally know someone who thought the vaccine had a good chance of killing

This is the straw man

[dead]
Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by ceejayoz on Friday October 29, 2021 @03:47PM (#29042765)
This really doesn't track with even basic fact checking.

They didn't treat it like the Black Death; if anything, death estimates were way too low.

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/09/830664814/fauci-says-u-s-coro...

> The final toll currently "looks more like 60,000 than the 100,000 to 200,000" that U.S. officials previously estimated, Fauci said.

As for obesity and age, they were pretty clear on that:

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/practices/fauci-offers-upda...

> "It’s so clear that the overwhelming weight of serious disease and mortality is on those who are elderly and those with a serious comorbidity: heart disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes, obesity, respiratory difficulties," said Anthony Fauci, M.D., director of the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

> "There will be outliers, as we’ve seen with influenza, [a person] who is young and healthy who winds up getting COVID-19, [gets] seriously ill and dies," Fauci said in a taped interview with Howard Bauchner, M.D., editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association. "But if you look at the weight of the data the risk group is very, very clear."

You're getting mad at imaginary experts.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Saturday October 30, 2021 @04:43AM (#29047149)
Or perhaps they just aren’t that good? Because they might have poopoo-ed the risks at one time, at another time they have also inflated the risks to the point of making people think a positive test is a death sentence.

In addition to flat out lying about that Chinese lab, of course.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by ceejayoz on Saturday October 30, 2021 @02:53PM (#29051336)
Or, estimates are hard.

Any programmer knows “that should take a couple hours” may take just a few minutes or wind up taking days. We’ve all been there, despite being experts in our field.

At no point did I ever feel public health experts portrayed a COVID case as a death sentence. Much of the early uncertainty was whether the CFR was 1% versus 2% or so.

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Saturday October 30, 2021 @07:18PM (#29053044)
Oh yeah, when it’s time to put measures on other people, we’re all so absolutely sure how it’s necessary and how it’s going to work. Just trust the experts, they know what’s right!

But when it later turns out it didn’t work, well we can never be sure now can we?

Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by ceejayoz on Saturday October 30, 2021 @08:46PM (#29053530)
I trust that experts in epidemiology have a better chance than I do, yes. Similarly, they should trust me on estimating software projects, even if I've been by no means perfect at it.
Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos... by tinus_hn on Sunday October 31, 2021 @02:02PM (#29058908)
An interesting difference is that if I hire you and common sense tells me your estimate is impossible I’ll just not do business with you.

But even if common sense makes it clear that the ideas of these experts are unachievable and are never going to work, like the ‘covid 0’ plans and the ‘15 days to stop the spread’ plans, or the doomsday predictions that are clearly never going to come true, I can’t choose not to suffer the consequences.

These experts are a lot less than perfect. Some of them are more like politicians then like scientists. And the ones that are more like scientists frequently contradict each other, which is perfectly fine but should show people with common sense that it is not the brightest idea to blindly trust anything they say.