News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:For a legally blind player, Far Cry 6’s accessibility opt... by jrootabega on Friday October 29, 2021 @10:45AM (#29039072)
They don't benefit absolutely everyone; that's hyperbolic language. They /could/ benefit everyone in a situation of varying degrees of severity that that person /could/ possibly be in at one time.
Re:For a legally blind player, Far Cry 6’s accessibility opt... by criddell on Friday October 29, 2021 @11:23AM (#29039563)
Do you think adding qualifiers makes the point any clearer? I think it just makes it harder to read. Accessibility options in video games do nothing for new born babies or people in a vegetative state, but that doesn't really need to be said.
Re:For a legally blind player, Far Cry 6’s accessibility opt... by jrootabega on Friday October 29, 2021 @11:31AM (#29039667)
The point being made was wrong, and the language suggests rhetoric more than reason.
Re:For a legally blind player, Far Cry 6’s accessibility opt... by fao_ on Friday October 29, 2021 @11:02PM (#29045638)
Reason is how you figure out if something meets a criteria. Rhetoric is how you convince people. That's a simple fact of the human mind and not one that can be easily outplayed.