News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by ra7 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @02:34PM (#29029619)
Don’t like Facebook one bit, but Zuck is almost always spot on with his bets. So yes, incredibly scary as it has a high likelihood of succeeding.
Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by adpirz on Thursday October 28, 2021 @02:47PM (#29029865)
This discounts a lot of failures and products without real success:

- Facebook Apps

- Facebook Home

- Facebook Workplace

- Facebook Portal

- Facebook Essentials

What he's done well: found promising competition and subsumed them.

I think AR is going to be a huge part of the future. I don't think Facebook is going to lead that effort, not because I don't want them to (though I don't), but because they don't have a track record of building anything worthwhile outside of their core offering (ie, the Facebook product).

Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by spookthesunset on Thursday October 28, 2021 @08:39PM (#29033918)
Don't forget their weird crypto thing....
Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by mohanmcgeek on Thursday October 28, 2021 @03:06PM (#29030191)
Also "Facebook platform" which Chamath ran to the ground.
Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by matt123456789 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @05:35PM (#29032343)
So what you’re saying is, now would be a good time to be a promising social AR/VR startup?
Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by mig39 on Thursday October 28, 2021 @04:55PM (#29031874)
Anyone remember the Facebook Phone?
Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by mrkramer on Thursday October 28, 2021 @03:05PM (#29030177)
>Don’t like Facebook one bit, but Zuck is almost always spot on with his bets. So yes, incredibly scary as it has a high likelihood of succeeding.

Instagram was growing like crazy, even faster than Facebook in its early days so acquisition was no-brainer. Instagram used Facebook's social graph so acquisition made even more sense.

On the other hand WhatsApp had hundreds millions users at the time of acquisition and Larry Page was very close to acquiring it before Zuck but Facebook offered more money that's why it turned out to be one of the biggest acquisitions in the history of Internet($19bn). WhatsApp's huge userbase and rapid growth could've endangered Facebook Messenger that Zuck was about to separate from main Facebook app and make it standalone instant messaging Facebook app.

So both Instagram and WhatsApp were no-brainer and made perfect sense and Facebook had cash pile to do it so they did it.

Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by whitepaint on Thursday October 28, 2021 @03:43PM (#29030777)
What?!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3817840 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7266618

Unless you're an extremely successful businessman yourself, calling those acquisitions no-brainers is just completely dishonest.

Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by mrkramer on Thursday October 28, 2021 @03:59PM (#29031071)
In 1.5 years Instagram had 50 million monthly active users[0]. Yea it was no-brainer considering other mobile photo apps existed and Facebook and Twitter were also doing photos.

[0] https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/instagram-...

Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by jimkleiber on Thursday October 28, 2021 @02:39PM (#29029718)
Yea, watching some of the demo made me think of how deeply involved people got with The Sims. A platform where people could actually be their own Sim?

Maybe Second Life and those didn't take off as much because the technology wasn't yet there.

That being said, I still don't want Zuckerberg to be the king of it, but there are plenty of possibilities with high-definition VR/AR tech.

Re:Facebook Renames to Meta by cblconfederate on Friday October 29, 2021 @03:06AM (#29036018)
The things zuck bought were already successful. It was more about stopping them from becoming too successful.