> the odd time I setup a PC and have to open a gaping browser, it's such an assault on the senses
Oh god I know exactly what you mean. I install uBlock Origin as soon as humanly possible but that short window of time before it's done is such a bad experience.
I firmly believe this. However, I try to be more objective these days and even if I hate/disagree with something I still like to find some objective facts/data about things to see stuff from other perspectives.
Even if I find research that says everyone on earth likes ads except me, I won't change my personal stance on them.
Edit: forgot to add that by lying, I was referring more to the click rates and returns and whatnot, rather than the claims of the products that are advertised.
You're right -- it's nothing like 30%, except for maybe some extremes, e.g. "mesothelioma" where the user really wanted that information.
A few percent.
Is this possible? If you are stating from the go that you do not trust the numbers so you are doing your own study, isn't that a bias already?
I want something from, say, The German Institute of Being Really Honest, who are government-funded perhaps... a few studies from entities who don't have a dog in the fight is all I'm after.
If their conclusion is that people are happier with ads then so be it... I'm happy without them, that's for sure.
Why can’t you believe some ads have a clickthrough of 35%? You never see ads so you don’t know how good they can be, right?
Also, you see ads all the time on HN. This whole site is a marketing/advertising campaign for a VC company.
Personally. I love to buy stuff and I love to click on ads for things I might want to buy.
Ads come with tracking now... that needs to die immediately!
And I'm not talking about sites like HN: I know who owns it but they're not actively forcing me to watch some claim that "This thing will stop you being an ugly bastard and make women throw themselves at you"...
In fact, UBlock Origin shows nothing on this site.
That’s the very best kind of advertising. The kind that has fooled you into thinking it’s not there.
Every site has logs. They can all see where I've been, what I've looked at, how long I looked at it and so on. I get that part. I'm a developer. I build that stuff myself.
However, I need to draw the line somewhere and using UBlock Origin and never ever seeing an on-page advertisement AND minimising all tracking is the threat-model I'm targetting. And, I'd reckon that most people who care about privacy would stop about there too.
With HN, there are no distractions on the screen. Nothing flashing or moving or asking me to sign up or anything... that's what I am trying to prevent.
In any case, lets say I could stop everything and still let the text on a web page through on my browser... just the text, nothing else: we've seen in the past how even that is a signal that can be tracked.
We can't stop it completely but I feel that I'm doing my bit to make it less effective and hopefully, eventually, pointless.
Now, this is pure anecdotal but every result I found on DDG was from a company that either advertises, consults about SEO/ads, is Google, or otherwise part of the ad scumbaggery somewhere in the chain.
The thing that got me was they all said ads are brilliant (I know, odd, isn't it?). They all had click through figures ranging from a few percent to 35%. Are you kidding me? A third of people click on ads?
I couldn't find anything that said ads are shit or dangerous or even anything vaguely negative.
Now, I don't see ads. Ever. I have UBlock Origin and privacy badger and other settings to prevent them from showing on my screen but the odd time I setup a PC and have to open a gaping browser, it's such an assault on the senses.
I've asked on here before but is there somewhere out there in the internet that I can see unbiased research on ads. Something! Anything at all?