News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook chooses profits over people by rglullis on Friday October 22, 2021 @09:30AM (#28956961)
Unless you work and sell your labor "at-cost", you are also "profit-seeking". It does not mean that you are also "unethical".

Profit-seeking should not imply unethical, no need to twist language when there is already the vocabulary to convey the proper meaning.

Re:Facebook chooses profits over people by amelius on Friday October 22, 2021 @09:43AM (#28957093)
> Profit-seeking should not imply unethical

Nobody said that profit-seeking implies unethical. It was said that profit-seeking companies should not deserve our unconditional trust.

Re:Facebook chooses profits over people by yazantapuz on Friday October 22, 2021 @09:49AM (#28957158)
Nobody is saying that they deserve unconditional trust neither.
Re:Facebook chooses profits over people by pixelgeek on Friday October 22, 2021 @11:21AM (#28958353)
> Unless you work and sell your labor "at-cost", you are also "profit-seeking".

Well the last time I checked I didn't turn a blind eye to my work helping to start a promote a genocide in Burma so I really don't see your point.

I don't think that profit-seeking ever results in behaviour that is ethical. If I make a decision based on my desire for more money then it is almost always going to be a choice not based on ethical or moral values.

The difference is the scale. If I cut a few corners as a independent contractor then at worst my client gets slightly less value from their money.

If I cut corners as the owner of a chain restaurant then my profit-seeking has an impact on the employees I have and my customers.

If I am a major corporation that has billions of users then my profit-seeking has incredible impact.

Re:Facebook chooses profits over people by rglullis on Friday October 22, 2021 @12:09PM (#28958945)
You are using profit-seeking to convey the (immoral) idea of "favoring profits over ethics", while I am using the more (ammoral) neutral definition of "doing something for financial gains". Can we agree to that?

If so, you'd have to argue why you want to change a neutrally-charged concept into something that carries negative connotations.