Re:Hardened wood as a renewable alternative to steel and pla...
by soperj on Thursday October 21, 2021 @02:30PM
(#28948948)
It doesn't last so long in construction, rebar in concrete has like a 75 year lifespan no?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hardened wood as a renewable alternative to steel and pla...
by tedivm on Thursday October 21, 2021 @03:20PM
(#28949624)
> In reality, their life span is more like 50-100 years, and sometimes less. Building codes and policies generally require buildings to survive for several decades, but deterioration can begin in as little as 10 years.
Re:Hardened wood as a renewable alternative to steel and pla...
by zardo on Thursday October 21, 2021 @03:18PM
(#28949592)
Plus or minus 25 years depending on the environment and maintenance. But I would disagree that 75 years is not so long.
Re:Hardened wood as a renewable alternative to steel and pla...
by katbyte on Thursday October 21, 2021 @04:17PM
(#28950295)
Does that not depend if it’s stainless or not?
Re:Hardened wood as a renewable alternative to steel and pla...
by zardo on Thursday October 21, 2021 @07:42PM
(#28952199)
I think that's only used for structures immersed in seawater.
It's not that we can't design buildings to last longer, it's that you don't want to design a building to last two centuries when you know it's probably going to be torn down in 50 years no matter what shape it's in.
Re:Hardened wood as a renewable alternative to steel and pla...
by meltedcapacitor on Friday October 22, 2021 @04:25AM
(#28954834)
Stainless steel rebar is also used for (not only seaside) bridges etc, but at 10x the cost it's not going to be in ordinary buildings.
If a building is made harder to demolish than its neighbours it's got a better chance to survive. I plan plutonium-core concrete walls for my mausoleum to prevent future generations from interfering with it.