News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is ... by crawsome on Thursday October 21, 2021 @09:39AM (#28944173)
Yeah, Moot's legacy sure has been doing the world a lot of favors. You sure we should be referencing his logic?
Re:Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is ... by polartx on Thursday October 21, 2021 @09:44AM (#28944251)
I’d choose a world with his legacy over Zuck’s ten times out of ten.
Re:Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is ... by tlholaday on Thursday October 21, 2021 @09:51AM (#28944350)
Yes, I am sure we should be referencing the logic of his proposal, and that we should consider that moot’s implementation of ephemerality on 4chan allowed too much persistence.
Re:Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is ... by HamburgerEmoji on Thursday October 21, 2021 @09:45AM (#28944266)
4chan and the MSM are both despicable slime pits in their own ways, but 4chan is much more honest. If the corporate media decides some subject is taboo, or that some line of inquiry is banned in order to protect advertisers' profit, you'll still be able to find extremely strong signal about those topics on 4chan.
Re:Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is ... by md8z on Thursday October 21, 2021 @11:43AM (#28946128)
Anonymous sites like Blind and 4chan (and other semi-anonymous sites like Twitter and its clones) seem to have the same problem but in reverse, where everything is overloaded with negativity and creates that strong signal, even if it's unwarranted. There is a reason conspiracy theories, misinformation, racism, and other cynical rhetoric tend to spread so well on those sites. I think Twitter and Blind have improved their moderation recently... but 4chan seems to always be the same cesspool.