"Maybe future socialists will adjust accordingly and promulgate the slacker gene in some other form?"

Please stop using HN for ideological battle. You've been doing it a ton, and we ban that sort of account.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: your account seems to have been using HN exclusively for this. That's not allowed here, so I've banned it. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email [email protected] and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future.

Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28940061 and stop posting flamebait and perpetuating flamewars.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I do not understand why you mean, it is obvious no.

Exactly, the house maintains itself continuously, grew itself out of soil, and there was no financial risk involved.

> socialists get rich on medical stocks

The haut bourgeoisie are, by and large, not socialists, but capitalists in the ideological as well as the class sense.

This is terminology-wrangling that happens constantly when the bad effects of socialism to society come up. Socialism invites corruption, because it concentrates power for the sake of a vague and unattainable goal. It demands redefinition of words, because otherwise it would be seen for the tyranny that it is.

Please do not perpetuate flamewars on HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Please do not perpetuate flamewars on HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Really?

"..future socialists will adjust accordingly and promulgate the slacker gene..."