News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by qeternity on Monday October 18, 2021 @08:57PM (#28913753)
Backblaze was tweeting about being profitable as late as 2020: https://twitter.com/backblaze/status/1242481625004273665
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by mcny on Monday October 18, 2021 @09:30PM (#28913908)
Can the service itself be profitable but the company not be? I mean how do we define profitable?
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by lmm on Monday October 18, 2021 @11:10PM (#28914462)
Presumably the employees are working below-market in exchange for equity, so the company is not really profitable yet - it's sort of "ramen profitable" in that it's profitable if you don't count the full rate of the workers' time.
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by CameronNemo on Monday October 18, 2021 @09:39PM (#28913951)
If the service is provided by employees who are compensated with equity, why would you not count that in profitability numbers?
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by dboreham on Monday October 18, 2021 @10:50PM (#28914352)
Because that's literally one of the reasons to use equity based compensation.
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by asdfaoeu on Monday October 18, 2021 @10:48PM (#28914344)
The figures above are with GAAP standards but as a private company do they actually have to use that?
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by jacquesm on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @06:24AM (#28916629)
It certainly helps if you plan on going public at any point in the future.
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by jhanschoo on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @12:06AM (#28914756)
Taxation, I guess?
Re:Backblaze S-1 IPO by nl on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @08:56AM (#28917554)
There's a lot of ways to measure "profitable".

Judging from their current numbers the service is profitable on a per user basis, less marketing expenses.

This is a pretty reasonable way to look at it. Being cashflow positive means you can turn up marketing to grow and turn it down if needed.