Everybody has the right to achieve a decent life. What you are actually asking for is the right to have material wealth. Which isn't a right.
>technically you may have a point (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here)
I don't want the benefit of the doubt from you. You advocate robbing people and spread hate against a group you don't like because you don't have enough toys to make you happy. You are just a part of a mob that has repeated the same mistake countless times in history, with your beliefs you are practically not an individual.
I don't see how you can so easily divorce the two. If I can't afford to send my kids to school - do I have a decent life? If I can't afford to see the doctor, do I have a decent life? I'm not arguing that everyone should be afforded to drive Lamborghini's, but that the American project of guaranteeing individual liberties and freedom is predicated on some wealth distribution; otherwise the working class are effectively slaves to their own existence.
Democracy is a means on how that power is utilized in order to control the individual lives of others. You wouldn't reject that standard for any other law; you wouldn't allow rich people to openly commit murder because you didn't want to infringe in their individual liberty.
And I advocate robbing anyone? No, I advocate pointing the finger to the robbers instead. I withdraw the benefit of the doubt I have given you earlier, you are very unreasonable and dogmatic in your views. Look around you from time to time, you're going to see a lot more people failing who should have not, hard working people with good work ethic.
I'm not sure what you're getting at, technically you may have a point (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here) but at the end of the day when all resources are owned by a few, things start to break down.