Re:The booming business of knitting together the world’s ele...
by GordonS on Sunday October 17, 2021 @01:36PM
(#28898184)
Number of severe incidents divided by number of reactor days?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The booming business of knitting together the world’s ele...
by rgbrenner on Sunday October 17, 2021 @01:59PM
(#28898333)
China has the newest plants in the world:
https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/age-profile-o...
We don't know how they'll perform as they age. If we calculated quality as you suggest, they would probably win.. but we would expect brand new plants to have fewer issues than 30 year old plants.
Re:The booming business of knitting together the world’s ele...
by littlestymaar on Sunday October 17, 2021 @04:45PM
(#28899636)
> but we would expect brand new plants to have fewer issues than 30 year old plants.
That's a strange expectation to have. Ever heard of the bathtub curve ?
Re:The booming business of knitting together the world’s ele...
by natch on Sunday October 17, 2021 @02:11PM
(#28898439)
In your formula, where do you envision the number of incidents being derived from?
China excels at hiding important information from public view, so I would take their data, and data indirectly sourced from them, with a grain of salt. And oh, by the way, one could say the same about the nuclear industry and its captured regulatory bodies in general as well.
Re:The booming business of knitting together the world’s ele...
by GordonS on Sunday October 17, 2021 @03:16PM
(#28898948)
That is true, which is why I specifically mentioned "severe" incidents - even if less severe stuff happens and is hushed up, it's impossible to keep radioactive particles blowing across the globe quiet, so we'd surely know of those.