Re:Southwest operational meltdown as hundreds of flights can...
by cronix on Monday October 11, 2021 @12:58PM
(#28830404)
Wikipedia says about using wikipedia:
> Wikipedia can be a great tool for learning and researching information. However, as with all reference works, Wikipedia is not considered to be a reliable source as not everything in Wikipedia is accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased.
So, there's also that to consider.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Researching_with_Wik...
Re:Southwest operational meltdown as hundreds of flights can...
by ceejayoz on Monday October 11, 2021 @01:07PM
(#28830513)
That's why you can (and should!) scroll to the bottom of an article and consult the references, if you're unsure.
Re:Southwest operational meltdown as hundreds of flights can...
by anarticle on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @11:34AM
(#28841013)
I have worked with HEK cells and linked to Wikipedia as it is generalized enough for public consumption.
Here's a Nature Communications paper on HEK293 containing a brief history with an impact factor ~13. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5767
Above 10 is considered of significant worth.
If that's not good enough for you, stick to whatever it is you're good at, and stop citing trash.
That's their MO.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Veritas