Google adds a guitar tuner to Search

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by Kaibeezy on Monday October 11, 2021 @05:03AM (#28826278)

I read it as dissing all free/crap/adware. Which is like dissing TV adverts or billboards or, I dunno, stickers on racing cars.

So, cough up for Netflix, or move to an area where people have expended effort to make sure billboards are not permitted, or, I dunno, go watch the ponies. It’s all out there, just got to pay one of the prices.

If you don’t want ads, you pay, or pick up one of dozens of perfectly serviceable used hardware tuners on eBay for 5 quid all day long.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by NikolaNovak on Monday October 11, 2021 @09:28AM (#28828068)

I guess I'm in the opposite camp. I have a drawer of clip-on tuners which broke or ran out of battery which is hard to change or just weren't easy to use or reliable. A sturdy boss tuner somewhere in my drawer of cables that's pain to pull out. And two apps that are on all my devices, easily always accessible at home or friend's, and can tune my guitar my bass and my kids ukulele. I wish I preferred the hardware unit, I do - but the convenience factor of the app is too high. I am not spammed with adware but I assume I paid for them at some point - I get value so I gave them money. My expectation of free apps are exactly what price would suggest. We have a choice between ad supported and paid product. Put your money where your mouth - or rather righteous blogs and comments are.

Edit: google "best tuner apps" and the two I use are consistently at the top. If those aren't in the top 30 of your appstore search, then we have a discoverablity problem, not a free or ad supported software problem. And again, if you picked random tuner from Amazon instead of going to store or reading reviews your experience might be the same. So - let's focus on what true issue / rage is, and compare apples to apples :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by amelius on Monday October 11, 2021 @05:48AM (#28826550)

I'm ok with ads. I just don't want to see them everywhere I look.

And no, "just" move to another place is not a proper argument:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergo_decedo

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by Kaibeezy on Monday October 11, 2021 @07:20AM (#28827069)

You're right.

I didn't mean to say “move to an area where people have expended effort to make sure billboards are not permitted”.

I meant to say “expend effort to make sure billboards are not permitted, or move to an area where people have expended effort to make sure billboards are not permitted”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by matheusmoreira on Monday October 11, 2021 @10:44AM (#28828889)

> Which is like dissing TV adverts or billboards or, I dunno, stickers on racing cars.

Absolutely nothing wrong with criticizing any of that. Paying for TV channels yet being forced to see ads is an indignity. Billboards and all other forms of advertising are nothing but visual pollution, cities that have banned them are nicer. Stickers on racing cars are also visual pollution.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by matheusmoreira on Monday October 11, 2021 @08:09AM (#28827415)

> If you don’t want ads

You block them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google adds a guitar tuner to Search by zo1 on Monday October 11, 2021 @09:42AM (#28828196)

Except you can't. At least not easily, and that's just for now.

[ Parent | on HN ]