Re:Facebook banned me for life because I help people use it ...
by jakelazaroff on Thursday October 07, 2021 @04:37PM
(#28791716)
If Facebook bans me, I can still use Twitter/Reddit/LinkedIn/TikTok/YouTube/WordPress/my own website. If Con Edison bans me, there are literally zero legal ways for me to make electricity come out of my wall sockets.
Re:Facebook banned me for life because I help people use it ...
by tombert on Thursday October 07, 2021 @04:50PM
(#28791867)
That's fair, Con Edison has an actual monopoly (more or less, it's weird and you can license third-party power), while Facebook just has a plurality of social media attention. Hell, I didn't even have a Facebook until last week when I bought my Oculus Quest (though I used a fake name and a burner email address), so clearly it's not vital.
As I said before, i agree with the OP, I was just trying to entertain a different point of view.
Re:Facebook banned me for life because I help people use it ...
by thehappypm on Thursday October 07, 2021 @05:12PM
(#28792158)
In what way on Earth is Facebook a near-monopoly?
TikTok and YouTube are also huge social networks.
Obviously this isn't a great comparison, you could make a much stronger argument for a "necessity" of electricity than a platform to share photos with friends, but that argument could be made that because of the ubiquity of Facebook (and subsidiaries), maybe they should be a free speech zone.
[1] NYC's biggest power company.