News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paddle announces iOS IAP alternative that avoids Apple's ... by whywhywhywhy on Thursday October 07, 2021 @06:44AM (#28784575)
The real question isn't why they deserve 30% lots of people have plenty of arguments about why they believe it's justified because they provide the hardware and dev tools on iOS.

The real question is why I don't have to pay them 30% for software and transactions on my MacBook. Because once you consider that most of those arguments are thrown out.

Re:Paddle announces iOS IAP alternative that avoids Apple's ... by rockbruno on Thursday October 07, 2021 @08:21AM (#28785277)
I don't mind the 30% at all, I just mind that I'm forced to because they banned the creation of any and all alternatives. The fact that someone would need to build their own phone + OS just to avoid a fee is both hilarious and scary
Re:Paddle announces iOS IAP alternative that avoids Apple's ... by dragandj on Thursday October 07, 2021 @06:55AM (#28784642)
"Provide" is a bit vague word for "sell". They _sell_ their hardware and force the developers to use their tools.
Re:Paddle announces iOS IAP alternative that avoids Apple's ... by mikevm on Thursday October 07, 2021 @06:58AM (#28784673)
But you already pay them $99/year for a dev account... why do you have to pay them for every purchase as well?
Re:Paddle announces iOS IAP alternative that avoids Apple's ... by leodriesch on Thursday October 07, 2021 @07:37AM (#28784940)
$99/y is really nothing compared to the 30% cut when you look at companies like Epic or Supercell.

I’m certain that they could not continue to provide the App Store in its current form without any fee.

Re:Paddle announces iOS IAP alternative that avoids Apple's ... by mafriese on Thursday October 07, 2021 @10:02AM (#28786378)
Because the 99$/year are for the dev platform and the 15%/30% cut are for using the infrastructure needed for in app purchases.