News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower. Parent comment

Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower by rPlayer6554 on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:07PM (#28765647)
> Facebook PR: “Today a Senate Commerce subcommittee held a hearing with a former product manager at Facebook who worked for the company for less than two years, had no direct reports, never attended a decision-point meeting with C-level executives — and testified more than six times to not working on the subject matter in question.”

Where does it mention her character??

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower by ceejayoz on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:45PM (#28766051)
Where does it address "the subject matter in question"?

She leaked 18k documents. How does the number of direct reports she supervised affect their veracity?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower by _3u10 on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:59PM (#28766221)
They are addressing the testimony provided, not the documents which have not been provided.

Generally after hacking a company, the documents are provided in a ZIP for everyone to download. Information wants to be free, but we are only being provided with her summary of the documents rather than the evidence itself.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower by ceejayoz on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @06:09PM (#28766331)
> They are addressing the testimony provided…

How? Where?

[ Parent | on HN ]