Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower
by rPlayer6554 on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:07PM
(#28765647)
> Facebook PR: “Today a Senate Commerce subcommittee held a hearing with a former product manager at Facebook who worked for the company for less than two years, had no direct reports, never attended a decision-point meeting with C-level executives — and testified more than six times to not working on the subject matter in question.”
Where does it mention her character??
Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower
by ceejayoz on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:45PM
(#28766051)
Where does it address "the subject matter in question"?
She leaked 18k documents. How does the number of direct reports she supervised affect their veracity?
Re:Facebook’s attempt to smear the whistleblower
by _3u10 on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:59PM
(#28766221)
They are addressing the testimony provided, not the documents which have not been provided.
Generally after hacking a company, the documents are provided in a ZIP for everyone to download. Information wants to be free, but we are only being provided with her summary of the documents rather than the evidence itself.
Let them defend themselves without character assassination, please.