Re:Tesla must pay $137M to ex-worker over hostile work envir...
by erfgh on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @05:55AM
(#28757253)
There are witnesses and the jury evaluates them.
Re:Tesla must pay $137M to ex-worker over hostile work envir...
by mrjangles on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @07:11AM
(#28757846)
The relevant section from the article
>“In addition to Mr. Diaz, three other witnesses (all non-Tesla contract employees) testified at trial that they regularly heard racial slurs (including the n-word) on the Fremont factory floor. While they all agreed that the use of the n-word was not appropriate in the workplace, they also agreed that most of the time they thought the language was used in a ‘friendly’ manner and usually by African-American colleagues.”
Re:Tesla must pay $137M to ex-worker over hostile work envir...
by pranavjoneja on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @06:14AM
(#28757402)
This is a civil case. Juries are only for criminal cases.
Re:Tesla must pay $137M to ex-worker over hostile work envir...
by IdoRA on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @06:45AM
(#28757657)
Juries are common in civil trials in the US.
Re:Tesla must pay $137M to ex-worker over hostile work envir...
by TheCoelacanth on Tuesday October 05, 2021 @06:54PM
(#28766769)
> In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
7th amendment says otherwise.
How do you even prove such a thing? Especially 5 years after you have left the place. And how does it not become a case of he said, she said?