Re:New York's largest healthcare provider fires 1,400 unvacc...
by iammisc on Monday October 04, 2021 @07:10PM
(#28753533)
How is mandating a remote employee, who's clearly not moving around a legitimate interstate interest. Pray do tell. In general, non-kangaroo courts require laws to be written to be suitably tailored and narrow in scope.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New York's largest healthcare provider fires 1,400 unvacc...
by throwaway0a5e on Monday October 04, 2021 @08:29PM
(#28754131)
>How is mandating a remote employee, who's clearly not moving around a legitimate interstate interest
Do I get to use the same asinine reasoning they used in Wickard v. Filburn?
Because if not then your guess is as good as mine.