Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by Ajay-p on Thursday September 23, 2021 @11:06AM
(#28630233)
Please, what this mean in simpler terms?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by bserge on Thursday September 23, 2021 @12:44PM
(#28631656)
People would afford fewer imports, pretty much.
You'd think "China makes everything" but they do need raw materials and fuel. They also import a lot of food, not sure how necessary it is.
So the smart thing to do is invest heavily into poor but resource rich countries in Africa.
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by topkai22 on Thursday September 23, 2021 @11:15AM
(#28630378)
Public debt = all loans to the government of a country
US Federal Debt = all loans to the US Federal Government (which excludes loans to state and local governments).
Private Debt = all loans to non-governmental entities (individuals/businesses/corporations) in a country.
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by xyzzy21 on Thursday September 23, 2021 @11:19AM
(#28630440)
In China there really isn't a difference - the Communist Party is partial owner of ALL "private" corporations.
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by eunos on Thursday September 23, 2021 @11:29AM
(#28630636)
If party owned Evergrande they don't need to have three red lines drama
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by christophilus on Thursday September 23, 2021 @11:15AM
(#28630375)
No one knows, but I think it means we're going to see a massive deleveraging event in both China and the US. But maybe we can all keep kicking the can indefinitely. Who knows?
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by beerandt on Thursday September 23, 2021 @11:42AM
(#28630790)
If Chinese are looking for alternatives to collapsing domestic investment, I don't see how they do that at the scale they need to without leaning further into US bonds, whether directly or via Chinese government using it to back up domestic offerings.
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by tevon on Thursday September 23, 2021 @12:52PM
(#28631781)
Do you think this would put us (the US) in a stronger strategic position going forward?
It seems like the music has to stop eventually for Chinese growth, especially since the differential between "real" GDP and reported GDP is likely larger than even this seems.
If they lean into US bonds, wouldn't that weaken their strategic position? I'm not sure they'd be willing to do so.