News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by saadalem on Monday September 20, 2021 @07:17PM (#28600262)
i think someone should start a fund that exclusively invests in startups that get torn to shreds on HN, “Why would anyone use this, I could build it in a weekend!”.. often means the startup goes on to reach a billion dollar valuation. here's my idea: understand the sentiment of HN comments using BOW models on successful startups already lunched, invest in the next ones.
Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by humanistbot on Monday September 20, 2021 @10:57PM (#28601641)
> Why would anyone use this, I could build it in a weekend!”.. often means the startup goes on to reach a billion dollar valuation.

I'm going to take extreme issue with your use of the word "often" here.

Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by puchatek on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @12:53AM (#28602138)
In that case I shall take issue with _your_ use of the word "extreme" (even though I ultimately cannot verify the level of issue you took)
Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by mikepurvis on Monday September 20, 2021 @09:08PM (#28600996)
Sounds like an IFF fallacy— sure, HN hates some thing that turn out to be successful, but lots of things HN hates really are terrible (or turn out to be successful for unrelated reasons, like the team was great and they managed to pivot away from the terrible idea).
Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by 1cvmask on Monday September 20, 2021 @10:11PM (#28601349)
It is like not seeing the potential in Dropbox.

Anyone technically minded used FTP back in the days. So why is there a need for Dropbox (at that time).

That is what makes it hard to invest if you think too much or "know" too much. You get blinkers that prevent you seeing what become obvious successes because of UX improvements for the non-technical crowd.

Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by setr on Monday September 20, 2021 @11:10PM (#28601714)
It’s not like… that’s precisely the scenario being referred to. The problem is that’s always the example, which suggests that the dropbox event is likely closer to the exception than the rule. And it’s existence is used to deflect all criticisms, which is generally an indefensibly dumb strategy.

Knowing the subject well may put blinders in some situations… but what’s the alternative? Know the subject poorly, flail about wildly and hope you land something by pure chance? Obviously knowledge isn’t the problem here; you need it to qualify if it’s a good decision or not. It’s the over-specialization, combined with the lack of empathy for the average user that derived the dropbox event.

Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by riffraff on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @01:21AM (#28602260)
time to run a statistical analysis on "I can build it easily myself" comments!
Re:Show HN: 40k HN comments mentioning books, extracted usin... by Semiapies on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @02:57AM (#28602638)
AKA, "Yes, they laughed at Columbus, but they also laughed at Bozo the clown."