Every S-1 in existence says that. Why people always share this excerpt when an S-1 is listed here in HN?
Just look back at any S-1 post and there's always somebody who shares it. Why? Do they really think they are illuminating someone else with the most boiler-plate phrase in the existence of S-1 filings?
Re:Gitlab S-1
by dec0dedab0de on Friday September 17, 2021 @01:36PM
(#28568385)
Even if they go broke and get taken over by a completely evil group tomorrow they will have left behind a very nice open source project.
Re:Gitlab S-1
by bradstewart on Friday September 17, 2021 @01:34PM
(#28568350)
Pretty much every S1 ever has similar language. Do you refuse to use any public company products?
This verbiage is present in basically every S-1 and quarterly filing, if not verbatim, then very close.
Re:Gitlab S-1
by MattGaiser on Friday September 17, 2021 @01:33PM
(#28568336)
Most financial filings are filled with cover your ass statements like this.
Re:Gitlab S-1
by throw03172019 on Friday September 17, 2021 @01:47PM
(#28568551)
Correct. The Robinhood disclosures were a fun read with Dogecoin trades (meme coin) being a large portion of their revenue.
What does completely private mean? Do you mean bootstrapped?
Re:Gitlab S-1
by JohnWhigham on Friday September 17, 2021 @01:33PM
(#28568338)
Yeah, not VC-funded. Stupid mistake on my part given the industry we're in
Re:Gitlab S-1
by mikepurvis on Friday September 17, 2021 @01:46PM
(#28568543)
They're literally a YC company: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/gitlab
I don't know why I thought Gitlab was completely private, but...welp, see ya later Gitlab. I'm looking forward to see what revenue you can squeeze out of customers from afar, without me on the platform.