News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes... by phendrenad2 on Friday September 17, 2021 @07:10AM (#28563922)
Search engines should be something you pay for. Surely search engine powerusers can afford to pay for such a service. If Google makes $1 per user per month or something, that's not too high a bar to get over.
Re:A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes... by titzer on Friday September 17, 2021 @09:34AM (#28565299)
Search engines should be like libraries. At least some tiny sliver of the billions we spend on education and research should go to, you know, actually organizing the world's information and making it universally available.
Re:A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes... by illys on Monday September 20, 2021 @10:53AM (#28594439)
I see another issue here: companies like Google prioritize information to 1) keep their users and 2) maximize their profit.

If you move data organization to another type of organization (non-profit, state, universities - private or public), then the question of data prioritization becomes highly political. What should be exposed? What should not? What to put first? ...

It is already, but to a smaller extend since money-making companies have little interest in data meaning, and high interest in the commercial value of their users.

Re:A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes... by wizzwizz4 on Friday September 17, 2021 @08:22AM (#28564586)
In which case, consider paying for something like Infinity: https://infinitysearch.co/
Re:A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes... by varjag on Saturday September 18, 2021 @05:18AM (#28574797)
The theoretical cap for this, if you include every human being on planet Earth, is 7 billion/month. This translates into $84 billion annual revenue.

Google's revenue last year was 146 billion, and it operates not anywhere near the theoretical maximum. Most of that revenue is advertisement.