https://www.reddit.com/r/ParlerWatch/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Stormer#Content_and_...
These groups are deliberately allowed to do this.
I don't agree with the comment you were replying to either, it's just that I don't really find this argument convincing.
https://www.faena.com/aleph/umberto-eco-a-practical-list-for...
>8. The enemy is both weak and strong. “[…] the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”
Not without illegal criminal acts you mean? You’re using euphemisms to excuse authoritarian actions by anti free speech digital thugs.
> Left-ish people are among the most tolerant people your can find, unless you tolerate intolerance. That's a hard line.
I’m sure this moral certainty sounds virtuous to you, but it is simply intolerant in the end. The use of malleable and subjective opinions as purity tests doesn’t make you right and doesn’t make these criminal actions ethical or moral.
re: Purity tests: lol