Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by adricl on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @02:25AM
(#28535875)
How would you power it? A nuclear reactor?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by LeoPanthera on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @03:08AM
(#28536147)
Radio receivers are not power hungry. Even a small solar cell and battery would probably suffice.
I suspect that returning the signal to Earth would consume more power than the actual receiver part.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by Ginden on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @05:27AM
(#28537008)
Are you sure about that?
https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.2.2019013...
> In a breakaway session, a telescope engineer told colleagues that power consumption alone could cost tens of millions of euros each year, a sizable chunk of the array’s projected €100 million annual operating cost. If costs did not come down, the energy requirements had the potential to hobble or even sink the project.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by rtkwe on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @10:38AM
(#28539663)
You're comparing two vastly different types of radio observatories. That's for an array where you have dozens to hundreds of amps, signal processors and antennas that require power. This would be much closer to the Arecibo telescope or the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope in power requirements.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by marcyb5st on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @04:22AM
(#28536618)
As others mentioned solar is just fine. I believe the majority of the energy will be needed to keep the batteries warm enough to work (like the drone that is currently on Mars). Bouncing the signal back to earth will be more problematic as you need a satellite orbiting the moon.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by phaemon on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @04:45AM
(#28536735)
Or a long cable...
5078dc16f05cc325c8f8804f68e20feac85bea84
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by phaemon on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @11:58AM
(#28540724)
Actually, it wouldn't need to be that long. The circumference of the moon is 40k kilometres, so assuming the site was in the center of the far side (though there's no reason it needs to be), that would put it at ~10,000 km from sight of the earth.
That's shorter than some transatlantic cables. I reckon it would be doable.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by jl6 on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @03:33AM
(#28536314)
Solar+battery would work just fine. There’s no dark side of the moon, just longer days and nights.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by lstodd on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @02:27AM
(#28535889)
A RITEG would do. It doesn't need much power.
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by femto on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @02:52AM
(#28536043)
Solar would also do, as long as it has about 14 days of battery backup. Lunar weather is pretty consistent! :)
Re:Lunar Crater Radio Telescope on the Far-Side of the Moon ...
by lstodd on Thursday September 16, 2021 @01:12AM
(#28548282)
Solar+batteries sort of can do it, but that wasn't ever attempted on the Moon, while ritegs are a very well known and proven tech.
This all pales beyound mounting the cables though. If anyone does _that_ then the power issues are moot.