Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by Bud on Sunday September 12, 2021 @09:36PM
(#28506939)
No, it's because they are fucking wackjobs. That's a fact. It's not an accusation. And it's not because of any bullshit about "who they are accused of being"; it's because of their wackjob argument.
They are promoting a conspiracy theory that the WTC was destroyed by a controlled demolition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9...
Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by hsousa on Sunday September 12, 2021 @09:42PM
(#28506976)
How is that not an accusation?
Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by swader999 on Sunday September 12, 2021 @10:11PM
(#28507149)
How about building 7?
Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by Bud on Monday September 13, 2021 @10:30AM
(#28511960)
The collapse of building 7 is the subject of wackjob conspiracy theories as well, even though its collapse has been conclusively explained by studies done by real engineers.
Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by swader999 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @01:17AM
(#28520528)
I'd like to read some of these if you have links?
Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by Lammy on Sunday September 12, 2021 @09:45PM
(#28506993)
Yeah I think we should believe the unbiased explanation and give a $7-billion no-bid contract to the Vice President's private military contracting firm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7444083.stm
Re:9/11 Material Released in Response to Executive Order 14040
by knownjorbist on Sunday September 12, 2021 @10:04PM
(#28507108)
Instead of vagaries, actually connect the dots.
The outcome of 9/11 in terms of the gov't seizing the opportunity was going to happen either way - you need a better argument than "look what happened after".
In other words its a "these people can't be heard because of who they've been accused of being" argument.