Re:Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighb...
by amelius on Sunday September 05, 2021 @05:58AM
(#28422905)
You misunderstood. The only way to rent a place is to rent it from an investor. If investors are banned from the city, then students need to buy the house/room they live in. This is of course not feasible for the majority of students.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighb...
by jhgb on Sunday September 05, 2021 @06:03AM
(#28422932)
> The only way to rent a place is to rent it from an investor.
You mean in the Netherlands? Because I never had to do that in my country. I'm not aware of places where the only landlords are investors.
Re:Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighb...
by Pet_Ant on Sunday September 05, 2021 @07:03AM
(#28423291)
I think you are missing the point.
All landowners are investors. They bought the property to make money. That makes them an investor. Maybe not a coporation but an investor.
Re:Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighb...
by jhgb on Sunday September 05, 2021 @07:05AM
(#28423304)
Surely the Dutch are not using your proposed definition, because that would make zero sense unless they wanted to turn the Netherlands into another Chernobyl exclusion zone. That seems unreasonable, so they must be using a different one.
Re:Dutch cities want to ban property investors in all neighb...
by kalium-xyz on Sunday September 05, 2021 @07:34AM
(#28423474)
It is the definition we use. This is just gonna create more kafka tier stuff for people to deal with, its not gonna end housing if Amsterdam decides it only wants multi millionaires with privately owned overly expensive houses in certain areas.