News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by deviation on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:51AM (#28389344)
I could care less about the attitude or acumen of Jeff or Elon personally.

From a business perspective though, it's absolutely bonkers to see Amazon wasting such an immense amount of resources in an attempt to slow the competition down, rather than speed their own up.

It's like watching a child flip the monopoly board after realising they can't buy any more properties and remain on top.

Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by sumedh on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:10AM (#28389440)
Its not bonkers if you have a ruthless win at all costs strategy. You dont become the richest man in the world by being nice.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by wiz21c on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:36AM (#28389563)
Ergo being not nice is necessary to success. What a wonderful world.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by masklinn on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:53AM (#28389638)
> Ergo being not nice is necessary to success.

It’s not necessary, but it probably helps. It’s also a great american tradition (though by no means unique to american), and so is calling for the state to help you not being nice (and then people wonder why US unions are antagonistic…)

Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by fwsgonzo on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:42AM (#28389590)
Indeed, as we can see with the Sackler family getting away with murdering millions of Americans.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by Scarblac on Thursday September 02, 2021 @04:27AM (#28389788)
Being the richest man in the world is not the only form of success, luckily.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by 88 on Thursday September 02, 2021 @04:02AM (#28389666)
Wealth ≠ success
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by jason0597 on Thursday September 02, 2021 @10:45AM (#28392697)
Please. The only people who say that are making cushy salaries. Head on over to a place like /r/povertyfinance and tell the people there with a straight face that "Wealth ≠ success"
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by ntpl on Thursday September 02, 2021 @11:58AM (#28393688)
While wealth (or rather, being "wealthy") is absolutely a success, it is not the only way to succeed nor is its definition "not being poor".

As such, I'd like to believe people at places like /r/povertyfinance would still consider themselves successful if they moved beyond their financial challenges through a ton of work even if they don't end up wealthy.

Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by krsdcbl on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:40PM (#28396428)
not for success. But for domination
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by user-the-name on Thursday September 02, 2021 @04:32AM (#28389816)
Success, and/or a guillotine.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by nikanj on Thursday September 02, 2021 @04:26AM (#28389783)
When you and your friend are running from a dragon, you can survive by running faster - or tripping your friend
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by nix23 on Thursday September 02, 2021 @05:51AM (#28390243)
But who is the dragon then?
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by ZeikJT on Thursday September 02, 2021 @12:39PM (#28394213)
Not being first to market I guess?
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by nix23 on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:36PM (#28396380)
And who then is your friend and who are you?
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by specialist on Thursday September 02, 2021 @07:00AM (#28390586)
Market winners are libertarians. Everyone else are socialists.

One nice unintended side effect of Bezos' tantrums (demands for more cake and ice cream) is the implicit recognition that governments create markets, are the source of all wealth.

As a taxpayer, I'm overjoyed that we're bankrolling SpaceX (and everyone else). I want sat phones and vacations on Mars.

Then in 10 years, when Musk is a trillionaire, I'll be even happier when we claw back his windfall thru repeated radical cashectomies.

Once Musk is reduced back down to billionaire status, award him a Presidential Freedom Markets™ Medal. And maybe rename some buildings.

Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t... by megablast on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:21AM (#28389489)
> I could care less

Oh come on.