He first explains a concept with logically and narrative consistency in order to explain why something occur. Then at the end he goes and demonstrate all the wholes in the theory and through that shine a light at where the narrative fails. It is only after going through multiple different competing theories that the edges start to get defined.
- Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst
- Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers: The Acclaimed Guide to Stress, Stress-Related Diseases, and Coping
The man is also just an incredible lecturer, too.
Sapolsky could literally give a lecture on shit and I'd be at the bus stop, someone would mention just a sliver of a lead and I'd intergect with, "I just saw this amazing lecture on shit by Sapolsky ..." to a complete stranger.
His lectures are that good. He is science jesus.
What I think makes the course so good is that it gives you a brief but solid introduction to many different fields:
And then combines all of those to try to make sense of human behavior, by looking at animal and human behavior from all these different lenses.