Re:Roman priest’s exceptionally well-preserved remains found...
by hulitu on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @01:46AM
(#28376746)
This wikipedia article is based on 20th century sources. Will be very nice when such an article will be based on original sources rather than biased interpretations and extrapolations 2000 years later. As Frank Herbert said: History is written by historians.
Re:Roman priest’s exceptionally well-preserved remains found...
by Natsu on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @02:37AM
(#28376995)
I must say, "20th century sources" isn't exactly a phrase that comes to mind when discussing Tacitus. But pray tell, what's your translation of the original Latin? It's not particularly difficult to find the original text here:
I see no attempt at nuance here, so taking this at face value, are we then to simply dismiss Pliny the Younger's writings to Trajan about persecution? Should we ignore Hadrian's note of slanderous attacks on Christians? Was Tacitus writing also 'myth' in saying that Nero blamed Christians for the fire in Rome?
— Tacitus' Annals 15.44https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_t...
This was a complex period in history, I would be wary of anyone making sweeping judgements or applying modern political coloring which acts to cloud issues rather than to illuminate history.