Re:Surveilance bill rushed through Australian parliament in ...
by cryptonector on Tuesday August 31, 2021 @05:53PM
(#28374166)
I think GP must be referring to Scalia's vote in Salinas v. Texas, which decided that a defendant's silence can be used against them at trial unless they specifically invoked their 5th amendment right to be quiet.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Surveilance bill rushed through Australian parliament in ...
by maerF0x0 on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:53PM
(#28396569)
Most directly I am referring to Duane's advice, of which I do not know his direct source (but I'm sure it's in the book as there are extensive notes).
Just thought I'd help clarify where I was coming from. That trial does seem to fit the scenario though.