Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by nxpnsv on Thursday August 26, 2021 @04:23AM
(#28312060)
I know this is annoying, but why % first, and why 2 leading zeroes. It just looks odd. :D
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by akie on Thursday August 26, 2021 @04:33AM
(#28312124)
Cultural habits?
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by nxpnsv on Thursday August 26, 2021 @05:31AM
(#28312558)
Most likely, but what culture?
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by heavenlyblue on Thursday August 26, 2021 @07:21AM
(#28313371)
It makes numbers easy to compare visually - one doesn’t need to analyse them positionally.
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by stronglikedan on Thursday August 26, 2021 @10:55AM
(#28315743)
Only when justified ;-)
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by stavros on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:47AM
(#28310809)
Oh man, I didn't expect seeing it written "C-zero-two" to bug me that much :P
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by PeterHolzwarth on Thursday August 26, 2021 @01:44AM
(#28311131)
(I'm sorry - I have long since given in to this strange urge to type short alpha-numerics as hex. I can't justify it; it's habitual; and when I catch it, I always hope no-one is using a font that highlights it.)
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by stavros on Thursday August 26, 2021 @01:48AM
(#28311148)
Haha, no worries, it was just odd to see.
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by this_was_posted on Thursday August 26, 2021 @04:05AM
(#28311931)
Could burning biofuel to generate highly concentrated co2 cheapen the process? This way there would also always be energy available for the capturing process and the capturing plants would be mostly just plots of land with plants on them.
Re:The dream of carbon air capture edges toward reality
by GOONIMMUNE on Thursday August 26, 2021 @01:50PM
(#28318160)
My understanding is that this is the central idea behind BECCS (mentioned briefly in the article)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioenergy_with_carbon_capture_...
In order, air is, broadly, made up of the following:
Nitrogen: %78.084
Oxygen: %20.946
Argon: %00.934
C02: %00.042
The stuff is essentially beyond a rounding error - it really gives one an appreciation of the "either don't release it, or capture it at the point of release" sentiment, and for the difficulties in making carbon capture outside of these scenarios be even slightly cost-effective. It's great to see progress on this front.