Re:SpaceX’s Starlink near-misses with other spacecraft are g...
by kitsunesoba on Friday August 20, 2021 @03:12PM
(#28250155)
Generally speaking, the higher the orbit the higher the chances of unrecoverable Kessler syndrome. For example if something went wrong way out in geosynchronous orbit and caused a chain of collisions, there's basically nothing we could do except clean it up manually — on its own it'd remain a mess for thousands of years.
For the lowest orbits, worst case scenario is just waiting 2-5 years for it to clear itself up.
Re:SpaceX’s Starlink near-misses with other spacecraft are g...
by m4rtink on Friday August 20, 2021 @04:14PM
(#28250878)
Would it be a big problem elsewhere than in Geo ? All the Geo birds are basically in one plane and don't really move in repect to each other.
So I'm not sure you could really even trigger Kessler syndrome there & it would likely be quite easy to avoid that debris belt if you did.
Re:SpaceX’s Starlink near-misses with other spacecraft are g...
by peeters on Friday August 20, 2021 @03:37PM
(#28250465)
Thankfully GSO is also 4300x as spatious, and we don't need as many satellites up there in comparison.
Re:SpaceX’s Starlink near-misses with other spacecraft are g...
by mlindner on Friday August 20, 2021 @03:45PM
(#28250561)
Not only is it crazy small, it's impossible. Kessler syndrome doesn't result in "space junk barrier" nonsense. That's from media and movies, not a possible reality.
Re:SpaceX’s Starlink near-misses with other spacecraft are g...
by tick_tock_tick on Friday August 20, 2021 @03:12PM
(#28250156)
> The probability of cascade-crash space-junk barrier is crazy small? Right?
Yes
The probability of cascade-crash space-junk barrier is crazy small? Right?